Filed under

bing

 

NOT SEO: The Fastest Way to Get to Page One of Google You'd Never Think Of...

How to Get to Page One of Google in Less Than 15 Minutes Under Any Search Term

Media_httpamericandre_shffp

You're not going to like this. You're not going to like this quasi SEO SEM how-to blog post about how to get to page one of Google under any search term within 15 minutes not because it's disappointing. This technique is 100% appointing. This technique will make you do a face-palm and say to yourself, "Duh! Why didn't I think of this!"

I personally discovered this technique because I was on the other side of the fence. I was in a position where I had the #1 spot in Google under "wireless internet" and under "wifi router." My only problem is that I had no way of monetizing the massive traffic I got under these terms.

In other words, if you want to get to page one of Google under any search term in less than 15 minutes, do a search for that term. Click on every link on page one. Find the sites that have no apparent method of monetization. You're probably going to find a ton of outdates websites and blogs that haven't been updated in years. You see where we are going?

Instead of trying to climb the ladder to the top of Google...

Contact the owners of these sites. Instead of trying to climb the ladder to the top of Google. Take those pairs of shoes that are abandoned on the stairway. 

Google does it. Instead of building a hardware engineering team to compete with Apple, they just bought Motorola. Try it. you'd be surprised how cheaply you can acquire a high ranking website in Google right after the rent is due.

--

Postscript:

If you can't afford to buy a site or a blog that's on page one... just buy several that are on pages 2-5. Then rewrite the content on those pages to point to the highest ranking page. The cumulitive rank power from the sites on pages 2-5 of a Google result will push that one site on page 2 up to page one. If you need help doing any of this... Call http://sparkah.com at 310 598 1606 and 347 767 6775. We wrote: The Unabridge Art of War of Web Marketing

Filed under  //   bing   business   event_marketing   google   marketing   sem   seo   strategy  


Google Groups
Subscribe to Sparkah Secrets
Email:

Comments [0]

Microsoft Bing and Yahoo Team Up Against Google. Is this a Google Killer?

Conanstef_normal
StephStricklen: RT @SebastianX: Wow. RT @GregBoser Bing set to become default search for Yahoo http://bit.ly/16uKto (expand)

Avatar_normal
michaelstrobel: AdAge reports Yahoo is close to making Microsoft's Bing it's search provider. Watch out Google.
about 3 hours ago from Tweetie · Reply · View Tweet

Mike-hat_normal

mikegrehan: Shut up, shut up, shut up, the Bing thing is good and it's not about a Google killer. Only ill informed pundits 
will make that comparison!
39 minutes ago from API · Reply · View Tweet

2882ab2_normal
atul: There’s No Such Thing As A Google Killer (Skrentablog) tip @techmeme http://tr.im/uvjj
26 minutes ago from web · Reply · View Tweet

Join the Emerging Technology Watch Forum

Filed under  //   bing   google   google killer   microsoft   msft   yahoo  


Google Groups
Subscribe to Sparkah Secrets
Email:

Comments [2]

How Hulu Got it's Name OR Bing and Hulu vs Google's Youtube and Kittens

Youtube to loose half a Billion Dollars in 2009. NOT Mahalo Dollars.

Not sure if you realize this, Google tried getting NBC, ABC, FOX, CBS, and yes, DISNEY into Youtube. Guess what they decided to do? "Gee, let's see, should we give our professional SAG, AFTRA, DGA, WGA, and CAA talent (PS, I still don't have my all access guest invite! /madface) to Google?"

"It would be so much easier to give up our direct network access at the viewer by giving Google all the ownership of the railroads and letting Google be the toll booth operator via Youtube than it would to hire a few IT guys to make a website in this crappy economy where Computer Scientist PhD's are working at 7-11," thought all the network heads from all the big studios.

Yep, as you can now see, Microsoft's Bing is now in bed with Hulu to give Google the shaft (in a federal penitentiary kinna way)

"Yeah, Youtube! THAT's the TICKET!," Yelled both Bob Wright and Jeff Zucker simultaneously in the board room equivalent of an olympic syncronized swimming finals. "Brilliant! All we have to do is associate ourselves with cute furry kittens! YES!"

Then out of one corner of the room the Romania-Croatian window washer uttered under his breath, "Youtube? Who loookes at Youtube? All cats now. Maybe only dogs. He he he."

That's when it happened. That Wiley Coyote light bulb went on above all the executives heads in the board room equivalent of the pentacostal pouring of holy spirit upon the heads of the Saints at the last supper.

"Who Looooooks at Youtube?!" Half of the balding boardmembers closest the balcony belched.

"Not I, says the brind man," The other half said in an accent more closely resembling Hiro on Heros than the Romanian-Croatian window man.

"Hooo Looooks at Youtube?!?!?!" The war chant raged on...

"DAWGS!" And they all burst out in laughter in the boardroom equivalent of that evil henchmen scene in Mystery Men.

What Youtube SHOULD DO to kick WhoLook's Ass

UPDATE: THIS cat video may just negate my entire arguement about cats as insufficient "fixin's (xeni's word for content)" for Youtube to compete against Hulu.

Filed under  //   bing   caaowesmeanallaccessinvite   google   hulu   youtube  


Google Groups
Subscribe to Sparkah Secrets
Email:

Comments [1]

Bing vs Google vs NewsPapers 2: Another Missed Niche Opportunity - Chronicity

Untitled from Wan Qi on Vimeo.

Well, sure enough, here's another major hole Bing.com SHOULD have capitalized on but didn't. Google leaves a huge hole in it's defenses but Microsoft doesn't even notice.

Filed under  //   bing   google   newspapers  


Google Groups
Subscribe to Sparkah Secrets
Email:

Comments [3]

Bing Vs. Google: How Bing SHOULD cling for a piece of da cha'ching.

Bing1

Bing sucks. Let's face it. Inspite of what NYT Walt Mossberg says, The design is NOT sensual and does NOT remind me of a glossy retail magazine. At all.
WSJ: This Web page is a perfect example of the search engine's engaging, attractive style. Bing.com evokes the cover of a glossy magazine with a stunning photo that takes over [MY GAG REFLEX - ed]
But I suppose since Bing's form is FAIL, what about function (can you tell I was an art and design student?)?
What Bing SHOULD do is simply find an area of search that google does NOT do well and tune it's algorithm just for that. Then continue to turn to produce better results for other interests like stuff that moms use. Think about it you PhDs... tech guys blog using keyword anchor that make smell like blood to Google's spiders. Most mom bloggers do not. Try it out.
Google and Bing, "lightest weight stroller for twins." If I was a mommy, I'd put that term smack dab in the middle of them "a href" tags and in my alt tags. Saddly, not a single real mommy blog comes up -- just some lame bizrate and about.com pages.
Bing SHOULD establish a firm hold on these wide open demographics then spread their dominance. But eh, they never read Art of War. Or paid me to consult. Which is really what they SHOULD do.
So how does Bing do in an area Google does do well? Well, if I'm in Soho NYC and I do a simple search for "latest open sushi soho," Google gives me two relevant results. One even intuits that I'm talking about hours of operation and gives me those times in the summary. Bing? It gives me a result citing obstetrics and gynecology. (Yeah, I'm just going to delete out the rest of this paragraph)

Filed under  //   bing   google   gynacology   gynaecology   obstetrics   sushi   wsj  


Google Groups
Subscribe to Sparkah Secrets
Email:

Comments [1]