journik’s posterous - a grade A shouldery. (social media marketing wise) - This is where I get to tell everyone else what they SHOULD do. And you get to obey.
Filed under

google

 

Why SEO is a S.C.A.M

SEO is a SCAM.

In Twitter, I see even experienced bloggers talking about SEO and SEM and SEX (X = random variable).

This to me, is pitiful.

You may still think SEO is crucial to your marketing efforts... But at the speed of information technology evolution, Your concept is neanderthal.

How SEO Started -- And WHY it's useless today:

Way back when Infoseek, Excite, Altavista, DogPile, and Inktomi for Yahoo was coming out, I was in Silicon Valley and San Francisco. I worked with many of the PhDs who built these Gen 1 Search Engines.

How they created their Search Engine ranking formula (called an algorithm) was forward engineering. How Google and Bing do it now is 100 percent the opposite. Google and Bing today, REVERSE Engineer.

Let me explain. Back when Mozilla HDP and Yahoo's Directory Project were launched, they were launched because all the algorithm based engines "sucked hairy balls" (Stanford PhD Technical Term -- You may have to use Wolfram Alpha to decode it). This is because:

1. Web Indexing Spiders Sucked.

2. Data Storage of Indexed Data was "Hella Expensive" (An MIT PhD Term. See above for explanation).

3. The entire internet was tiny. Even if you added up all the blogs -- both of 'em.

Since this was the case, it was impossible to get a comprehensive aka useful view of the internet. So, half of the PhD's in the "Valley" decided to just develop a human directory project (they Yang position In Daoism) and the other half of the Ying-Yang paradigm (this is the ONLY time ANYONE should use the word "paradigm") decided to just take a stab at best guessing an algorithm (the Yin position).

This is how Danny Sullivan's SearchEngineWatch.com came to be born. Danny collected marketing and ranking results from webmasters all over the world. He consulted to clients, reverse engineered every feeble algorithm, and now works from his pallacial OC oceanfront home. He earned it.

Back then, you COULD and SHOULD do SEO. All you had to do is make your site's keyword frequency and inbound links match Excite or Inktomi's (Yahoo's engine) expectations. Easy.

Now, Not So Mucho (just did an inspiring interview with IT Maven @jorgeavilam)!

They spider and measure your Gmail. They never delete a single email -- EVEN IF YOU DELETE AN EMAIL

Why SEO is BAD for Business

Now, Google has the entire frikkin internet graphed on one legal size page. They even have most every single business email conversation via Gmail. Yes. They spider and measure your Gmail. They never delete a single email -- EVEN IF YOU DELETE AN EMAIL (True Dat -- Cal Poly Phd speak).

Here's the big difference. Can I get a drum roll please?

Here's the big difference. Can I get a drum roll please?

Now, instead of guessing at how the bloguhsphere would link through to a relevant web url, Google simply reverse engineers the natural HUMAN linking patterns into their algorithm.

In other words, you cannot possibly, especially with a team of "SEO Experts" or "Social Media Experts," mimic the inbound linking fractility of the random public. You've all seen a fractal. Try to express that fractal in a calculus equation. YOU CAN'T. Give up!

So what do I do?

Simple.

How to Get to Page One of Google and Bing Today.

1.Make valuable content. Especially lists that people WILL NATURALLY LINK TO... like this:

2. Make all my Google Page One Pages a Youtube.
Google owns Youtube. Youtube is projectile bleeding money. Possibly a quarter to a half a billion dollars this year. So Google shows huge favoritism toward Youtube results. I know. I used to get thousands of uniques from google every hour from being #1 under "wireless internet." Now see:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=money+karma&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g-m1 AND http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=super+antioxidants&aq=f&oq=&aqi= AND http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=astaxanthin&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10

Peoples: THIS is a "Take-Away! Google even ranked Blogspot blogs higher than Wordpress (they own Blogspot -- Not Wordpress. Now that WP has more Adwords (owned by Google) Ads, Not so much)"

3. Talk About Famous People. They will link their powerful (High Page Rank) blogs to yours.
This is a side benefit of Interviewing people of influence

Am I wrong? - @Journik

About @journik: @Journik is Bob Wan-Qi Kim. He has been an internet entrepreneur since his first BBS on the "Information," "Super," "Highway." He founded http://journik.com -- a community like facebook but only for philosophers and their bull-shit.

His passion is exposing to the masses the power of Ancient Daoist (Origin of Acupuncture) Herbal Medicine when fused with Western Modern Genomic and Proteomic Sciences: His Client: http://jbni.us

See @journik's health blog: http://herbholist.posterous.com

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   business   excite   google   inktomi   marketing   scam   sem   seo   yahoo  

Comments [1]

Microsoft Bing and Yahoo Team Up Against Google. Is this a Google Killer?

Conanstef_normal
StephStricklen: RT @SebastianX: Wow. RT @GregBoser Bing set to become default search for Yahoo http://bit.ly/16uKto (expand)

Avatar_normal
michaelstrobel: AdAge reports Yahoo is close to making Microsoft's Bing it's search provider. Watch out Google.
about 3 hours ago from Tweetie · Reply · View Tweet

Mike-hat_normal

mikegrehan: Shut up, shut up, shut up, the Bing thing is good and it's not about a Google killer. Only ill informed pundits 
will make that comparison!
39 minutes ago from API · Reply · View Tweet

2882ab2_normal
atul: There’s No Such Thing As A Google Killer (Skrentablog) tip @techmeme http://tr.im/uvjj
26 minutes ago from web · Reply · View Tweet

Join the Emerging Technology Watch Forum

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bing   google   google killer   microsoft   msft   yahoo  

Comments [0]

Apple Blocks Google Voice iPhone App. Is Apple turning evil?

Googlelogo_normal

GOOGstock: Apple Isn't Evil For Rejecting Google Voice - Forbes http://bit.ly/x80Ax (expand)
43 minutes ago from twitterfeed · Reply · View Tweet

Nachodavid_normal
giantcranberry: @ducttape if Google were not so evil itself I would care more about how they are being treated by apple.
21 minutes ago from TweetDeck · Reply · View Tweet

Closeuphi_normal

ducttape: Apple blocking the Google Voice app seems evil
about 1 hour ago from web · Reply · View Tweet

Dsc01269_normal
anison: Sounds like it is ATT's fault RT @tkyes RT @HenrikJoreteg Apple is evil, they blocked the Google Voice App for iPhone! http://bit.ly/4u4miq (expand)
about 2 hours ago from TweetDeck · Reply · View Tweet

12391638033632659593_normal
tkyes: Bastards....! #FucktheiPhone! RT: @HenrikJoreteg Apple is evil, they blocked an official Google Voice App for iPhone! http://bit.ly/4u4miq (expand)
about 3 hours ago from web · Reply · View Tweet

3176160196_97dfb3bd15_b_normal
HenrikJoreteg: Apple is evil, they blocked an official Google Voice App for iPhone! http://bit.ly/4u4miq (expand)
about 3 hours ago from TweetDeck · Reply · View Tweet

Photo_12_normalRyan_normal
matttharp: @parallaxchico From a brand pov, it's damaging. Apple can't shout "we're not M$, they are evil", then pull this w/out alienating evangelsts
about 4 hours ago from web · Reply · View Tweet · Thread Show Conversation

Fo-twit_normalNewyena_normal
smblion: @protocollie Apple doesn't get a free pass because AT&T happens to be MORE evil. When you do business with evil, you are evil :p
about 4 hours ago from DestroyTwitter · Reply · View Tweet · Thread Show Conversation

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   corporation   evil   google   google voice   seattle   twitter  

Comments [0]

Google Launches Twitter Search with Relevancy. So... you SHOULD link to tweets from your favorite blogs

NOT from Twitter because...

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   google   twitter  

Comments [0]

How Hulu Got it's Name OR Bing and Hulu vs Google's Youtube and Kittens

Youtube to loose half a Billion Dollars in 2009. NOT Mahalo Dollars.

Not sure if you realize this, Google tried getting NBC, ABC, FOX, CBS, and yes, DISNEY into Youtube. Guess what they decided to do? "Gee, let's see, should we give our professional SAG, AFTRA, DGA, WGA, and CAA talent (PS, I still don't have my all access guest invite! /madface) to Google?"

"It would be so much easier to give up our direct network access at the viewer by giving Google all the ownership of the railroads and letting Google be the toll booth operator via Youtube than it would to hire a few IT guys to make a website in this crappy economy where Computer Scientist PhD's are working at 7-11," thought all the network heads from all the big studios.

Yep, as you can now see, Microsoft's Bing is now in bed with Hulu to give Google the shaft (in a federal penitentiary kinna way)

"Yeah, Youtube! THAT's the TICKET!," Yelled both Bob Wright and Jeff Zucker simultaneously in the board room equivalent of an olympic syncronized swimming finals. "Brilliant! All we have to do is associate ourselves with cute furry kittens! YES!"

Then out of one corner of the room the Romania-Croatian window washer uttered under his breath, "Youtube? Who loookes at Youtube? All cats now. Maybe only dogs. He he he."

That's when it happened. That Wiley Coyote light bulb went on above all the executives heads in the board room equivalent of the pentacostal pouring of holy spirit upon the heads of the Saints at the last supper.

"Who Looooooks at Youtube?!" Half of the balding boardmembers closest the balcony belched.

"Not I, says the brind man," The other half said in an accent more closely resembling Hiro on Heros than the Romanian-Croatian window man.

"Hooo Looooks at Youtube?!?!?!" The war chant raged on...

"DAWGS!" And they all burst out in laughter in the boardroom equivalent of that evil henchmen scene in Mystery Men.

What Youtube SHOULD DO to kick WhoLook's Ass

UPDATE: THIS cat video may just negate my entire arguement about cats as insufficient "fixin's (xeni's word for content)" for Youtube to compete against Hulu.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bing   caaowesmeanallaccessinvite   google   hulu   youtube  

Comments [0]

Bing vs Google vs NewsPapers 2: Another Missed Niche Opportunity - Chronicity

Untitled from Wan Qi on Vimeo.

Well, sure enough, here's another major hole Bing.com SHOULD have capitalized on but didn't. Google leaves a huge hole in it's defenses but Microsoft doesn't even notice.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bing   google   newspapers  

Comments [2]

Bing Vs. Google: How Bing SHOULD cling for a piece of da cha'ching.

Bing sucks. Let's face it. Inspite of what NYT Walt Mossberg says, The design is NOT sensual and does NOT remind me of a glossy retail magazine. At all.
WSJ: This Web page is a perfect example of the search engine's engaging, attractive style. Bing.com evokes the cover of a glossy magazine with a stunning photo that takes over [MY GAG REFLEX - ed]
But I suppose since Bing's form is FAIL, what about function (can you tell I was an art and design student?)?
What Bing SHOULD do is simply find an area of search that google does NOT do well and tune it's algorithm just for that. Then continue to turn to produce better results for other interests like stuff that moms use. Think about it you PhDs... tech guys blog using keyword anchor that make smell like blood to Google's spiders. Most mom bloggers do not. Try it out.
Google and Bing, "lightest weight stroller for twins." If I was a mommy, I'd put that term smack dab in the middle of them "a href" tags and in my alt tags. Saddly, not a single real mommy blog comes up -- just some lame bizrate and about.com pages.
Bing SHOULD establish a firm hold on these wide open demographics then spread their dominance. But eh, they never read Art of War. Or paid me to consult. Which is really what they SHOULD do.
So how does Bing do in an area Google does do well? Well, if I'm in Soho NYC and I do a simple search for "latest open sushi soho," Google gives me two relevant results. One even intuits that I'm talking about hours of operation and gives me those times in the summary. Bing? It gives me a result citing obstetrics and gynecology. (Yeah, I'm just going to delete out the rest of this paragraph)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   bing   google   gynacology   gynaecology   obstetrics   sushi   wsj  

Comments [0]

RT Google: The Next Wave. Executive Summary of 1:20:00 Video Clips. ENG SPAN FR PORT GER

english | spanish | french | portugues | german | chinese | korean

RT auto retweet via web

Executive summary of Google Wave:

How fast will Google change communication and marketing? 30sec
Very. They are opensourcing the API to the best developers on earth. 4000 in attendance.

What was Google's thinking for building Wave? 10sec
Google is rebuilding the internet. All of it.

What is the philosophy of Google Wave? 30sec
Instead of sending message, we will build a totem pole of communication

Wave vs email? 20sec
The ability to respond to select parts of any other message

Wave is more like a phone conversation using text 50sec
You actually get to see each character being typed in real time -- without hitting "send"

Monumental change in communication reach? 20sec
Every single conversation can be made public domain by any member of the discussion and syndicated all over myspace, facebook, blogs, and even text messages until you hit the little button that says "private"

How fast can a photo or video of me taken by a friend and "emailed" to another friend end up everywhere (you'll see what I mean by "everywhere")? 20sec
Click and drag

(answer to above) How easily can my entire "email" end up on a blog? 40sec
Rejoice or weep. You will likely do both.

Then, can a blog comment reach me via my Wave "email?" 20sec
Notice that the comment in the blog simultaneously updates the wave in realtime (obscured by top window)

Will my emails show up on everyone's cell phones too? 5sec
Yep

yep

What else will be public? 10sec
Even your photo captions

Can I edit my messages? 30sec
You and your third cousin Wilber too.

But if anyone can edit, what happens to accountability? 30sec
Google has included a process playback and replay feature.

How many people can edit a message? 20sec
Everyone. Simultaneously.

Can my international contacts collaborate in his/her language? 10sec
Yep. Simultaneously!

Will unique waves link to waves of totally disparate origin? 30sec
Yes. A butterfly in Tibet can now cause a tsunami in Okinawa.

What's my favorite innovation in wave? 1min
Intelligent realtime search and discovery.

How's the spell checker? 2min
It actually reads the entire sentence.

How can developers help? 50sec
By creating external gadgets that further streamline communication visualization

What about Twitter?
Wave ties in and tweets any part of any conversation just like any other medium.

Well, atleast our corporate messaging will be insulated by language! 20sec
Nope.

Every text message, every caption, every photograph name, every email, every blog post, every myspace comment, every facebook message, every twitter message, every thing... CAN BE PUBLIC AND MAY BE AUTO SYNDICATED by any member of the discussion to every text message, every caption, every photograph name, every email, every blog post, every myspace comment, every facebook message, every twitter message, every thing (unless you remember to check the box that say's "private"). Can anyone say, Nimrod's Tower of Babel?

How does this impact my marketing strategy?

Imagine you have a bloody nose. You go to the hospital. You know all the doctors there. They tell everyone in their blackberry and their email list and their church that you came into the hospital for a bloody nose. But the hospital happens to be underwater in the sea -- where sharks like to swim too. Good part is that you will indeed find your customers. They are waiting for you in each of the shark's bellys.

If you are now thinking that you will need a new CXO to manage web pr (stands for PRoliferation) You're already behind the 8-ball. Contact me, Wan Qi, and my team to talk about your marketing strategy, Tweet me @journik. Or Continue to "The ONE thing you must do to survive and thrive in the new Advertising, Marketing, PR landscape."

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   executive   google   google wave   summary   wave  

Comments [2]